German Economy Online: Press on the tariff law of unity

Friday, May 22, 2015

Press on the tariff law of unity – RP ONLINE

How the media report on the controversial tariff law of unity in Germany - After five years of Germany returns to the principle of Operation -. a collective agreement back

Rheinische Post:. The decision for a bargaining unit, law yesterday in the Bundestag marks a black day in the history of the social market economy Mag of displeasure with the consciousness of power and the dubious expansion motives of the train drivers' union be great harbors of political interference in the collective bargaining a high political risk, the effect of which could be worse than the strike by train drivers are not only populist opposition politicians, but also renowned constitutional lawyers who keep the law for unconstitutional if the Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe see this similarly -.. After all, politics is less with the law collective agreements annul unions - this would be a blow to a coalition that is actually worn by Union and SPD by the parties of the social market economy and of free collective bargaining, the coalition must also be a rule of law coalition and the strike is one of the world.. recognized system of free collective bargaining to. . Even if he is uncomfortable and covered

Mittelbayrische newspaper: The temporal relationship is striking. Just ended the ninth strike of the small train drivers union (GDL), while the Bundestag announced yesterday the tariff law of unity ahead. Nevertheless, the Parliament's decision is not Lex GDL. The need to ensure legal clarity in the case of competing workers' organizations in a company has existed since 2010. At that time, the Federal Labour Court broke with the proven six decades rule. A company - an agreement

Trierischer Volksfreund by 2010 was considered as a sort of unwritten rule: a plant, a collective agreement. And no one can argue that Germany would be so bad risks. The Republic stands therefore also economically so strong because the collective partnership works because unions act responsibly as a rule. Meanwhile, there are signs, however, that small craft unions have other ideas. Minorities thus become a power that majorities dominate in order to abuse them for wayward objectives. The Bundestag wants to put a leash on such unions. The only question is whether the law on collective bargaining unit for this is an appropriate means. The construction is constitutionally tricky because at the end of a collective agreement may be replaced by another. A union but that is not collective capable you can also just resolve itself.

Stuttgarter Zeitung: The legal debate over whether the now agreed tariff unit Act is constitutionally determined must be clarified in Karlsruhe. On the factual level, the decision is simple: the law is extremely useful, because it overwrites the old principle Operation, a union firmly.<br /> If small craft unions on strike for more pay and influence, they strike against not only their employers but also their colleagues in the same establishment. The new law may make industrial peace on a better basis. Yes, the big DGB unions benefit. But it is precisely these have joined in the past workers’ interests and a sense of proportion to each other. . Strength through unity – both sides of industry “height =” 331 “class =” jsimageselector hidden “/> </figure> <figure> <h2> Press on the tariff law of unity </h2> <p> <img src =

Braunschweiger Zeitung: This is a step backwards. Much better it would have been, the trade unions have clarified with each other, how they deal with each other in conflicts. The law was promoted to bargaining unit from strike by train drivers. It was not just about money but also about power. Certainly the policy could have given the unions more time to settle their dispute. Responsible for the law, they are, however, themselves. They have a piece of collective bargaining sacrificed, because they have forgotten the principle that freedom always includes the obligation to deal responsibly with it.

People's Voice: Andrea Nahles attempt to establish collective unit in a legal way, will fail with a high probability. Apart from the fact that it is not certain whether their law is constitutional. It is also unrealistic. The Bahn AG is like most large companies from many independent business units. In each the respective majority union must be determined as social partners. The employer must therefore continue to deal with several unions that may all go on strike. Train driver could also be paid to different tariffs. The confusion is even greater when train drivers change within the web or the Bahn AG restructured. The legislature would have been better to adopt rules that impede strikes in sectors of particular public importance and predictability. . Longer notice periods or mediation compulsory settled enforce constitutional

Kölner Stadt Anzeiger: For a long time no section work has tempers so heated as the bargaining unit law. After its adoption by Parliament, it would be time for a little more sobriety. It is absurd for the Left Party accuses the SPD, they tell the workers the right to strike and loop. After all, employers and DGB had called together, the principle Operation to restore a collective agreement. In fact, it is highly problematic, as more and more competitive small unions on strike not for higher wages, but also for the expansion of its sphere of influence. This leads to a lack of solidarity, to enforce their interests in the pilot, engineer or IT professional of a company. . Those who do not sit on the shift lever, has the disadvantage of

Märkische Oder Zeitung: The procedure, which is designed to ascertain where that union can come to train, should not serve the peace operation. That as the Union brawlers GDL and EVG peacefully agree on who is responsible for whom the railways, we may exclude well. Then to be counted. But who actually determines which organization has more members? But not about the top management? If the employees are forced to confession? Or unions to exact information about their strength? The bare madness. Whether this condition is ever permanent, may be doubted. After all, it's been just five years since the highest courts the bargaining unit has been declared unconstitutional.

Schwäbische Zeitung: The bargaining unit is small law unions the task rob to negotiate wages and working conditions. Even the right to strike would be up for debate. Companies, major unions and the federal government agree how rare that this would ensure greater peace in the factories. But perhaps the bill was made without the landlord. The Federal Constitutional Court could overturn the bargaining unit, as it violates the freedom of association. If the small unions win in Karlsruhe, would the big its members not only to explain why they have less taken out in collective talks as the strike funny competition. You would also explain why people should still be a member of them.

So the media report on the controversial tariff law of unity in Germany – After five years of Germany returns to the principle of” one operation – a collective agreement “back

Photo:. Qvist /Shutterstock.com/Retusche RPO

Kölner Stadt Anzeiger: “For a long time does not work Clause tempers so heated as the bargaining unit law. After its adoption by Parliament, it would be time for a little more sobriety. It is absurd for the Left Party accuses the SPD, they tell the workers the right to strike and loop. After all, employers and DGB had called together, the principle of “one operation, a collective agreement” restore. In fact, it is highly problematic, as more and more competitive small unions on strike not for higher wages, but also for the expansion of its sphere of influence. This leads to a lack of solidarity, to enforce their interests in the pilot, engineer or IT professional of a company. Those who do not sit on the shift lever, has the disadvantage. “

Photo: Qvist /Shutterstock.com/Retusche RPO

Märkische Oder Zeitung: “The procedure, which is designed to ascertain where that union can come to train, should not serve the peace operation. That as the Union brawlers GDL and EVG peacefully agree on who is responsible for whom the railways, we may exclude well. Then to be counted. But who actually determines which organization has more members? But not about the top management? If the employees are forced to confession? Or unions to exact information about their strength? The bare madness. Whether this condition is ever permanent, may be doubted. Finally, it is only five years ago that the highest courts the bargaining unit has been declared unconstitutional. “

Photo: Qvist /Shutterstock.com/Retusche RPO

Swabian newspaper: ” The bargaining unit is small law unions the task rob to negotiate wages and working conditions. Even the right to strike would be up for debate. Companies, major unions and the federal government agree how rare that this would ensure greater peace in the factories. But perhaps the bill was made without the landlord. The Federal Constitutional Court could overturn the bargaining unit, as it violates the freedom of association. If the small unions win in Karlsruhe, would the big its members not only to explain why they have less taken out in collective talks as the strike funny competition. You would also explain why people still member should be with them “

Photo:. Qvist /Shutterstock.com/Retusche RPO

Posted by Julio at 2:28 PM
Email This BlogThis!Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

No comments:

Post a Comment